It looks as though we are in the territory supported by this site on Monday – Government support for something not unlike the Neill amendment.
The Chancellor has ruled out extending furlough. Perhaps German and French schemes will provide his next source of inspiration.
We need a credible plan to reach net zero by 2050. A great prize is within our grasp, but XR is alienating the public.
They confirm that the Government and its critics aren’t that far apart – and Ministers are now distancing themselves from claims of illegality.
What made the Government play into the hands of the EU by casting itself as a law-breaker when its own version of events suggests it isn’t?
Either an election would have taken place, with a less good result for the Conservatives. Or the Commons would have settled on a second referendum.
It spotlights both the challenges involved in operating an independent trade policy and the limited political rewards of doing so.
The Government’s approach has been modelled on the country, even though its cases have continued to rise.
When such Brexiteers as Michael Howard and Norman Lamont are tearing into you over international law, you have just a bit of problem.
Meanwhile, the Prime Minister is vulnerable to a pincer movement on his plans for a potential carve-out from international law.
The Government cannot continue to yo-yo between opening and closing society.
The Speaker threatened to run Hancock “ragged” if the Health Secretary continues to insult the House.
Johnson and Cummings’ previous assaults on the pre-Brexit order have been brilliantly conceived. This one may not be up to the same standard.
And with 300,000 users downloading Northern Ireland’s app, it’s unclear to the public why England’s equivalent is taking so long.
It ought to be easier to get a trade deal than reach a Withdrawal Agreement. We suspect one will happen, but here’s why it might not.