Johnson’s pro-Remain article demonstrates that he had come to truly believe in Leave
Before it was published, speculation ran amok. The BBC even claimed it made the stronger case. Its publication sinks a few myths.
Before it was published, speculation ran amok. The BBC even claimed it made the stronger case. Its publication sinks a few myths.
Matters might reach a point at which although Brexit is not blocked, orderly government becomes impossible.
The post-referendum break-up of Vote Leave has left May and her ministers dangerously exposed to Continuity Remain.
David Willetts writes today that she favoured a strong currency. He is right. But there was a time when this wasn’t so, in which he had a walk-on part.
The recent love-bombing campaign has got the Northern Irish Tories worried. The case for a deal is obvious, but so are the risks.
The Nationalists can only hold their activists back and coalition together for so long, but with no surge in support a second independence referendum is a serious risk.
We cannot both be a member of it and control immigration properly. The referendum vote clearly plumped for the latter.
The Prime Minister managed to imply that the men attacking her are ridiculous.
Evidence suggests that there was a post-June 23rd spike. But a relationship with the referendum is contestable. And the normal trend soon reasserted itself.
If so, we should pay any new costs.
It is not so much like a parent or a nanny as a brother. Not Big Brother, to be sure, but Little Brother – to be treated both with sibling rivalry and understated love.
The way the Article 50 process works does not aid attempts to halt Britain leaving.
The 5.6 million of our fellow countrymen living overseas are a huge source of “soft power” – we should not be insulting them.
The Chancellor’s position recovers despite his advocacy of the Single Market, whilst the Home Secretary falls from 11th to 23rd.
It’s hard to imagine Conservative MEPs behaving the same way – Charles Tannock, for example, clocking, say, Geoffrey Van Orden.