Published:

73 comments

Yesterday evening we discussed
the events that led up to the sad resignation of James McGrath as a
senior aide to Boris Johnson.  Boris’ statement reacting to James’
resignation included these words:

"James is not a
racist.  I know that.  He shares my passionate belief that racism is
vile, repulsive and has no place in modern Britain. But his response to
a silly and hostile suggestion put to him by Marc Wadsworth, allowed
doubts to be raised about that commitment… James’s remark was taken
out of context and distorted, but he recognises the need for crystal
clarity on a vital issue like this.  We both agree that he could not
stay on as my political adviser without providing ammunition for those
who wish to deliberately misrepresent our clear and unambiguous
opposition to any racist tendencies."

In other
words: James is not a racist but I’m not prepared to risk standing up
to the people who suggest that he is.  In a very strong blog Iain Dale has accused Boris Johnson of a failure of backbone over the affair.  Those of us who know James McGrath are seriously angered by this episode. Comments on our previous post on this have been virtually unanimous in their opposition to the resignation.

Here’s a quick draft of an alternative statement that Boris could
and should have issued – perhaps on camera, supported by one of the
ethnically diverse appointments that he has made:

"You
will have seen internet coverage of remarks made by one of my advisers,
James McGrath.  I ask you to look at the context of the remarks and
judge whether the author of the piece – a Labour activist – is a
fair-minded person or someone with a political agenda.  I know James
and I know him not to be a racist.  He wouldn’t be part of my team if
he didn’t share my belief that London is greater because of its
diversity.  He wouldn’t be part of my team if he wasn’t committed to my
agenda of building a London where every citizen is respected regardless
of race, religion and sexuality.  There have, of course, been calls
from some quarters for me to sack James but I will not.  To do so would
only encourage more malicious and vexatious allegations against my
staff and other public figures. 
In these cases it becomes not about what somebody has said, but about how the media think somebody, somewhere
could wrongly perceive what they said. Racism is still a real problem
in too much of society but we devalue real incidents of racism when we
over-react to unfortunate uses of words.  I want to put an end to the
gotcha style of journalism that is always determined to think the worst
of people.  Most Londoners are fair-minded and want to think the best
of people.  My administration won’t be bullied by the politically
correct.  Our priorities are fighting crime, improving educational
opportunity and affordable housing.  James will continue to help me in
those tasks.  I will not throw a good man to the wolves."

73 comments for: The statement Boris should have made: I will not thow a good man to the wolves

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.