Nick Herbert MP, Shadow Minister for Police Reform, has – this morning – launched a mid-term policy review paper on his brief.  In The Telegraph he writes this:

"The lessons of New York are important ones. Better police performance was achieved by a combination of factors: a significant increase in police numbers on the streets, robust community policing and powerful reforms to enhance the accountability of managers. The changes were driven by an elected mayor who answered to the people, and an inspirational police chief who innovated and led his force… The founder of modern policing, Sir Robert Peel, famously said: "The police are the public and the public are the police." Police forces grew out of the localities. Restoring the accountability of the police to local communities will be an important counterbalance to the areas where more effective national co-ordination of policing will be required, such as in the fight against serious crime."


The key themes that are being put out to consultation are summarised below:

  • Britain gets poor value for money in the war on crime.
    Every household in England and Wales spends £550 a year on law and
    order – two-thirds of which goes to the police.  Britain is at the top
    of the OECD spending league when it comes to the proportion of national
    income spent on tackling crime but, amongst developed nations, only
    Australians are more likely to be victims of crime.  The report: "Less
    than a quarter of crimes are detected and receive a sanction…
    Increasing levels of funding have not led to corresponding increases in
    arrests and detections… On any available measure, police productivity
    has fallen, meaning that taxpayers have not received value for money."
  • Inadequate police visibility.
    Although’s Britain’s police officer numbers at 140,000 are at a record
    high that is still a low number by international standards.  In England
    and Wales there are 264 officers per 100,000 members of the population
    compared to 387 in France and 457 in New York.
  • Local accountability must replace central control.
    Only 14% of officers’ time is spent on patrol.  19.3% of time is
    consumed by paperwork.  The report: "The police’s hands must be untied
    to give them the discretion they need.  Forms and process which do not
    help the police to deliver a better service to the public should be
    eliminated.  Central direction and targets should be replaced by
    locally accountable leadership and priority setting."
  • Police structure must change.  The
    paper rejects the status quo and the Government’s failed attempts at
    regionalisation.  It proposes two alternatives.  One option would keep
    the 43 forces and their current range of responsibilities but would add
    two ingredients: local accountability to ensure the development of
    community policing and effective leadership from the centre to drive
    cross-force collaboration against serious crime.  The second option
    would see the 43 forces lose responsbilities to a Serious Crime Force,
    answerable to the Home Secretary.
  • Greater professionalisation.  The
    paper proposes a Sandhurst-style staff college to assess and support
    the development of a national cadre of senior officers who could be
    deployed across forces and responsibilities.  It also recommends that a
    more flexible police service might emerge if overtime costs are reduced
    and police officers receive a higher basic salary instead.  The paper
    also rejects positive discrimination and affirmative action as
    "counter-productive" routes to the creation of a more representative
    police service.
  • Local and democratic accountability.
    In the most significant recommendation of the report there is the
    suggestion that directly elected police commissioners should replace
    police authorities.  Chief constables would retain operational
    responsibility for day-to-day policing but commissioners could appoint
    and dismiss them.  The paper also proposes a "right to policing."
    Local communities would gain a right to regular beat meetings –
    involving councillors – and access to detailed, transparent information
    on crime levels in their localities.

Download a pdf of ‘Policing for the People’.

23 comments for: Nick Herbert’s plan to get better value for money from our police

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.