Published:

37 comments

Sunscan_1
David Davis has issued a brief response to this morning’s Sun exclusive that a Muslim police officer was excused from having to protect the Israeli Embassy:

“This individual case is a matter for the Commissioner. However, it goes without saying that the duty of a police officer to uphold the law must come before any political opinion that he or she may hold. It can never be acceptable to bend this principle.”

Archbishop Cranmer is a little bit more exercised about the whole affair:

"If police officers may pick and choose to which assignments they are posted, based solely on their individual consciences rather than any sense of corporate responsibility, where will this lead? Should Jewish officers be excused working at an Islamic national embassy? Will Catholic officers be excused assignments to Protestant churches? Should Christian officers be permitted to decline an order to police a Gay Pride march? Should Muslim officers be excused entering mosques to search them for guns or fake passports, on the grounds that it demeans their place of worship? Should Christians be permitted to object to entering mosques because they consider them to be dedicated to an evil cult worship? Should the Hindus and Sikhs be permitted to object because of the actions of Pakistani Muslims in Kashmir against their co-religionists? Who will this leave to search Britain’s mosques? The atheists? Must we now urgently recruit a disproportionate number of atheists into HM Police Force to ensure that there are always a sufficient number of officers who may not object on ‘moral grounds’? And what if the atheists object because they happen to think they can’t be bothered to protect the worshippers of any god, because they all deserve whatever bombs and bullets come their way?"

37 comments for: David Davis rejects policeman picking and choosing their duties

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.