Henry Hill is a British Conservative and Unionist activist, and author of the blog Dilettante. Follow Henry on Twitter. He is also editor of the non-party website Open Unionism, which can be followed on Twitter here.

national history, avoiding nationalism

to teach history in schools is a fascinating, complicated and important topic.
It is also a fundamentally political one. Given that most school pupils do not
go on to study history at an academic level at university, or even past GCSE
level, their school lessons can underpin their understanding of the past for
the rest of their life, an understanding which often shapes someone’s identity
and even their politics.

recently wrote elsewhere about the hornet’s nest that is the teaching of ‘national history’. That
article was prompted by a debate held in the closing stages of my Masters
degree here in Dublin about the practical impact of changes in historical
understanding and practice (called ‘historiography’). Between them, the Irish
and British examples demonstrated the problems both of teaching a historical
narrative to school pupils and of not
doing so.

the comments below that article, a couple of Anglonats pose the interesting question
of how to disentangle ‘British’ history from the discrete histories of the home
nations. I might not agree with them about Britain being a lesser sort of
entity than England, but even for a unionist with a British identity it’s an intriguing
puzzle. Do you simply teach completely separate history until the Act of Union,
or the annexation of Wales? Or do you take the view that the histories of all
areas of Britain have informed the modern British identity and nation, and
teach it to everyone? If, as is likely, the proper answer lies somewhere between
the two, how do you strike the balance?

might be the first to try. A panel commissioned by the Cardiff administration has come to the conclusion that Welsh pupils
ought to be taught to be familiar with ‘a map of their past’. They point out
that in many instances (‘ordinarily’) a country’s history curriculum focuses on
the history of that country, whereas in Wales many history teachers teach a
version of British history which is dominated by England, to the extent that
they are taught the history of their country at all. Much like the rest of Britain, Welsh schoolchildren are often taught in the 'thematic' style, based on a series of disjointed examples cherry-picked from European and American history.

This does
not appear to be an exclusively nationalist exercise – the report also claims that
not enough attention is paid to the other home nations, and one hopes they maintain that inclusive spirit in a Wales-centred history curriculum. Nonetheless, there are snares to dodge.

essential question of history is ‘why’, rather than ‘what’. It is this
essentially speculative element that elevates history above the memorisation of
facts into the debate-filled subject it is. The problem with a narrative
approach is that you risk following a chain of cause and effect without
dwelling on the vital ‘why’ junctions in it. Trying to teach the history of a
country in the confines of a few hours in a school week will inevitably pose
problems of what to include and what stance is taken on them.

Balancing the
teaching of Welsh history with a proper understanding of British history will
likewise be complicated, since the very nature of the multi-layered identity of
these islands means that a child almost always has more than one ‘map’ in their
history. A curriculum that does not recognise the Britishness of Welsh children sells them short.

for one hope they pull it off, and perhaps provide a model for balancing home
nations and British history that Gove and others can follow. Yet reading
further down, I do hope that the call for the entire school curriculum to be
set to national purposes goes nowhere. Injecting country into history is vital.
Injecting it into everything is not.

Police Scotland: Cracking
down on medieval crime

crime is one of those things one is always glad to hear the police are doing
something about. Yet, unlike firearms, knives are readily available on the high
street, so you rarely hear of the police seizing caches of them. Yet this week,
Edinburgh saw the seizure of over £100,000 worth of bladed weaponry, including
not only knives and daggers (the latter are bladed on both sides, apparently)
but also such exotic items as katana, broadswords, battle axes and a big blade
on a pole that looks like a glaive.

have all been seized as part of a licencing issue, and are apparently going to
be destroyed. That seems slightly tragic but if it neither is government policy
not to simply hold the stock until the proprietor can secure a licence, nor
sell it to properly licenced vendors, then fair enough. Yet the idea of a police
officer, with a completely straight face, intoning about how bad knives are for
“communities” (of course) against a backdrop of seized medieval weaponry
strikes me as better suited to a comedy routine than the news. After all, axes
and knives sufficient to murder an unarmoured human being can all be bought
over the counter from kitchen or tool shops, and if Edinburgh has had a spate
of broadsword murders recently I’ve not heard anything about them.

hope that Scotland’s other purveyors of obsolescent weaponry all have their
licences in proper order.

marriage splits Northern Ireland Assembly along constitutional lines…

An attempt to legislate for same-sex marriage in Northern Ireland – the only part of the UK without
such legislation – was defeated this week. In the most religious and
traditionally socially conservative province of the UK this might not be
surprising. Yet the way the vote divided was thought-provoking.

the Catholic Church arguing against the vote, every single nationalist MLA
voted in favour of gay marriage. They were joined by a grand total of three unionists, including the liberal ‘McUnionists’
we so signally failed to tempt into the party, John McCallister and Basil
McCrea. The Democratic Unionists introduced a veto, although along with the
Ulster Unionists they’d have been able to defeat the motion in a vote anyway.

part, this is probably a reflection of the fact that nationalist parties in
Northern Ireland are normally left of centre, the unionist parties right of
centre. Yet the break between the nationalist parties and the Catholic Church
is an interesting development, which hopefully presages a further weakening of
the iron hold that confessional identity has had on the politics of the
province to date.

fact that the established parties of political unionism closed ranks against it
is more concerning, and highlights once again the difficulty the electorate
must have in putting a cigarette paper between the DUP and the Ulster
Unionists. Whatever your opinion on gay marriage, Northern Irish unionism needs
a liberal wing.

of luck to Anglesey Conservatives

their election was delayed by a year, the isle of Anglesey will be the only
part of Wales voting in the elections. It’s a bit of an odd one, since it
appears the local Conservative and Liberal Democrat groups have dissolved
. Whether Tories are
standing under their party name or a local grouping, this column bids them good luck.

Comments are closed.