The younger generation has learned not to tolerate disagreement.
We are often poor at commercialising technology. Doing so requires scale, which in turn means we need large numbers of qualified people.
It should be the role of the Higher Education Minister to make the Government’s view known that on campus there are practically no limits to intellectual discussion.
We should encourage the next generation of Nobel Prize winners, world leaders and entrepreneurs to choose our fantastic universities.
All Labour has to do, if it wants to debate the Single Market in the Commons, is to hold opposition day debates on the subject.
Momentum’s momentum doesn’t need to fizz with punch: they’ve won already.
Far from a throwback to the past, the public needs urgently to see that this welcome debate is about equipping us for a post-Brexit future.
There is still no sign that the Government can find a workable definition.
Our universities churn out more graduates than is useful whilst necessary skills are under-supplied by the neglected vocational alternative.
In a nutshell, the cut was a doubling down on easing Brexit – which matters.
A university degree is perhaps the best conduit for social mobility.
Once there, we must ensure there is proper support to reduce dropout rates and further improve opportunity.
The new white paper rests on three serious fallacies.
The state is intervening to support a system that sees 32 per cent of graduates ending up in jobs that don’t require higher level skills.
Too many young people are taking on heavy debts for degrees that aren’t worth it. Building links with the job market will help tackle both of those problems.