Extreme gender ideology undermines cultural norms, scientific reality, the connection between motherhood and children, parental rights, and free speech.
It is good news that guidance has been corrected, but it should be noted that one’s legal sex and one’s biological sex are not identical.
Imposing collective guilt on a group is fundamentally unconservative. I hope never to see our Party dabble with it.
Unless the obvious definitions of biological sex are clearly established in law, then the sex-based protections of girls and women will be undermined.
The Government would be wise to encourage people to limit their casual sexual partners and to commit to safer sex using condoms.
If we allow the Left to impose their own ideology as the unassailable cultural norm, then we diminish the responsibilities of elected office.
The insidious idea that one’s sex is a solely matter of personal demand is seeping into policy and practice, almost unnoticed.
Making GRCs making GRCs available on demand would destabilise all manner of legal structures, from equal pay to sex discrimination law to criminal law.
As a Party, we should hold out a helping hand to all those who still face the difficulties of daily life – who still cannot be their authentic selves.
To preserve it is to defend the grammar of our common life, and our society and legal order are founded on the truth as we understand it.
I hesitate to disagree with Daniel Finkelstein, but city growth has been powered more by smalltown commuters than flat-cap wearing uber-boheminans.
There are three main factors at work – genetics, plus cultural and social factors. And it’s not possible at present to disentangle the mix.
The Minister for Women and Equalities deserves support from all who care about their safety and wellbeing of children.
The application by a 13-year-old schoolgirl could change the way in which schools and colleges apply guidance on gender identity.
With the Coronavirus engulfing parliamentary discussions, the legislation looks on hold for now.