John Nash: Our school reforms. We want parents to be more involved in their children’s education – not less.
We want to enable academies to move from a model where parents are chosen for their expertise.
We want to enable academies to move from a model where parents are chosen for their expertise.
This policy refuses to recognise local choice, is supported by a poor evidence base, and proposes large-scale upheaval for uncertain gain.
Universalisation may or may not be a good idea, but either way the Government cannot afford another blue-on-blue battleground at this sensitive time.
The Budget ducked the hard choices that need to be made.
The views of parents matter – and they can serve as a bulwark against corruption.
It will no longer be possible for schools to focus their energies and resources getting a narrow band of C/D grade students over the finishing line.
We should unify all schools under one simple legal status. Opponents of reform are full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Pupils and teachers face ridicule and ostracism for so much as uttering a single word of support for the Conservative Party.
The academies plan could mark the start of a more effective, cheaper, de-centralised, responsive and accountable way of running the nation’s services.
He makes the case for the Government’s extension, and Chris Cook of Newsnight (formerly a Willetts adviser) the case against it.
Especially so for smaller firms and entrepreneurs.
For too long, millions of our fellow Britons have lacked the skills or consistent record of employment to justify their level of workplace earnings.
Past solutions have focused chiefly on economic solutions, but the the cultural and social dimensions have been neglected.
This is an area where Conservatives can be proud of our compassionate record, but there remains more to do.
Labour allowed fashionable theories to undermine effective teaching and foster mass innumeracy, but this Government is putting it right.