A rough guide to where some of the pro-Brexit players are on further proposals for Canada Plus Plus Plus – and No Deal.
The myth has it that there never was such a plan – in fact, DexEU had a proposal to fulfil its promise of no ‘hard border’ while still overseeing a proper customs regime.
The deadline is August 6th. While the role has yet to capture the public’s imagination, it has genuine power.
Much of the establishment now accepts that Islamist ideology must be named and challenged. But this view doesn’t seem to be held by the new DPP.
He wants to take people with him in his quest to hit the Government’s target. But will radical policy ideas fit with his emollient political approach?
People’s preferences are clear. But the current system insists on bringing forward designs that jar painfully with them.
In my constituency, we have a target of just over 640 homes a year. Our housing waiting list is 3,000.
Onward seems set to propound the liberal and Freer the libertarian versions of the globalist agenda. Where does that leave the anti-globalist voters who now back the Tories?
At Policy Exchange, we see prosperity, people, place, and patriotism as the four pillars of a politics which seeks to unite the four nations, town and country, and north and south.
“Over recent years innovation has declined, and growth has stalled, because capital has not been allocated to productive investment.”
Even the liberal commentators are having to acknowledge that post-Brexit the country has become more welcoming to migration, not less.
It would be easy, but mistaken, to take the path of least resistance and simply re-enact the dated Cameron ‘modernising’ agenda.
The Government should consider setting up a domestic policy Cabinet sub-committee to help alleviate the Brexit bandwidth problem.
The injection of the truth that it would mean politicians in charge of services is enough to make most people see sense.
And, as Boles says, we will never build the number of homes we need unless the state is building 100,000 a year.