Residents need a real choice on estate redevelopment
If the only options are concrete blocks of various shapes then it is a bogus consultation.
If the only options are concrete blocks of various shapes then it is a bogus consultation.
Attractive developments are blocked – ugly ones are pushed through.
What stands in the way of the homes, jobs and savings proclaimed on the masthead of this site is not a state that’s too liberal, but one that’s not liberal enough.
The May government has so far set its sights no higher than its predecessor. Its aim remains Cameron’s – to build a one million homes during this parliament.
It’s time to defend and promote the ideas that have helped to bring globalisation – and in turn brought more wealth, peace and opportunity to billions of people.
We don’t have to listen to architectural gurus planning for a brave new world but redevelop estates to restore traditional streets.
They cannot stop development but they can shape it and help deliver more homes as well as infrastructure.
Let’s have annual statements of policy goals for the next five years – they should run to no more than a dozen sides of A4.
These are huge documents required by the EU which nobody reads.
The salient point is that it is government intervention that raises the cost of living.
The Tory Reform Group is investigating how we can have desirable homes, in desirable places.
The new Communities Secretary sees the construction of more homes as his priority. It is a daunting political mission.
Councils in towns and cities have often been obstructive.
There is a huge amount of talk about solving the problem, but too little effective action.
Neighbourhood plans provide over ten per cent more homes than local plans.