There have been some recent positive signs from the ECJ that EU states are within their rights already to curb blatant benefit abuse by migrants.
Given recent expressions of interest in the post, we have a record number of runners and riders.
The governing duopoly of the Prime Minister and Chancellor should be replaced by a collegiate top team – including the present ’22 Chairman as a new Chief Whip.
He is up four points.
Whatever one’s view of the origins of the conflict in Ukraine may be, Putin’s conduct has changed the balance of the argument about threat.
The silence can be attributed to three key factors: Firstly, a lack of inspiration. Second, a lack of agreement. Third, a lack of money.
But Sir Peter Tapsell showed, by warning about Greece and Russia, that it is possible to rise above parochial concerns.
The Sunday Times reports that No.10 is considering a date in 2016. What does that say about a Prime Minister who, apparently, wants to keep us in?
Which suggests that a big slice of them will campaign on the opposite side to Cameron in an In/Out referendum – even in the wake of a renegotiation.
At the risk of stating the obvious, the targeting of Charlie Hebdo and its staff for murder had nothing whatsoever to do with western foreign policy.
“Renegotiation” within the existing treaties is just changing EU policy – but our objection is that Brussels has the power to make policy at all.