Our columnist took issue with Lockdown Sceptics in his article yesterday. The Editor of that site replies.
State action to regulate social media is unproblematic in principle, but deeply problematic in practice – and the law of unintended consequences applies.
The dubious legal basis for lockdown restrictions should be clarified by making its scope explicit.
It seems highly unlikely that the action against Grimes will result in a prosecution, let alone a conviction. But that doesn’t make it OK.
Patel should haul in Dick for an interview without coffee. Meanwhile, Loughton intends to raise the case at the Home Affairs Select Committee.
We wouldn’t want constraints on free speech imposed on the basis of opaque agreements between platforms and politicians.
Every single charge under the Act – 141 so far – has been found unlawful on review by the CPS,
It is quite shocking that the Equality Act has been left totally unreformed, since it has morphed into the central juridical weapon of the left.
I was regaled with horror story after story on access to even existing testing. Confidence in the “moonshot” is non-existent.
The right to it must be championed even when – no: especially when – remarks are made that we find reprehensible.
Plus: Why the BBC must keep Neil. Why I’m leaving Lloyds. And: three hours with the LibDem leadership candidates.
As a Party, we should hold out a helping hand to all those who still face the difficulties of daily life – who still cannot be their authentic selves.
He’s General Min Aung Hlaing, the army’s Commander-in-Chief. Now is the time for sanctions that target the military.