There is no case for withholding it from them, for it only being shown after the event, or for not allowing them to study it.
In justifying their defence of Austria’s ‘blasphemy law’, its judges seem to be not just expanding but changing the relevant protections in the Convention.
Nodding through a doubling and quadrupling of the small claims limit to sums that are huge to most voters would be a step too far.
In the second of three articles, the Weston-super-Mare MP argues for drastic action to rebuild legitimacy in the eyes of the people.
If it is copied, tracked or taken unlawfully, then its owners should be compensated, regardless of whether they can prove ‘damage’.
From Tony the Tiger to the sale of narwhal ivory, from plastic straws to eating dogs, the list of proposed bans grows weekly.
Law enforcement has been misused to target political opponents. We must be wary to ensure the UK does not become complicit.
The Prime Minister once promised that: “We are not leaving only to return to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. That’s not going to happen.”
In the second of his two pieces, the author proposes a series of changes to ensure that the right balance is struck: convicting the guilty while not ruining innocent lives.
If ‘fair play’ is to mean anything, then it is vital that legal redress is available to all – regardless of income or background.
“We need to do something you might not expect me to say. We need to give Boris Johnson more power.”
Disputes have focused on questions arising from his plight – parental, ethical, legal. But it may be useful to widen the angle of the lens.
The Secret Barrister has attained a great success with his account of a legal system infected with squalid incompetence.
Bullying managers would know that they would have to expect to face justice. False accusers would know that they would have to prove any claim in court.