Cameron was right to revise the Ministerial Code
Writing for Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project, Professor John Finnis sets out why the Prime Minister was right to remove reference to ‘international law’.
Writing for Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project, Professor John Finnis sets out why the Prime Minister was right to remove reference to ‘international law’.
We agonise about how much oversight the state should have over us. But government is only going where others can also go, and often do.
As a former deputy chief constable, I saw this week how they failed to plan properly for the Conservative Conference – and, worse still, change their tactics.
Extremism Disruption Orders are draconian and unnecessary: the Government is already equipped with a bristling arsenal of anti-terror legislation.
It is going up again in London, and government needs to do more to ensure that the voluntary sector can deliver fully on prevention.
“The people most responsible for the terrible scenes we see are President Assad, the butchers of ISIL and the people running these criminal gangs.”
Women have their freedom of movement curtailed in ways that most men don’t even have to think about.
From moralising hackers online to ‘Sharia patrols’ on London streets, we should not tolerate extra-legal ethical coercion in any form.
The equivalent of 250,000 people every year are stopped and subjected to hugely intrusive searches without the police sticking to the rules.
If the trend of the last decade continues, it won’t be long before America has a million active heroin users.
What if instead of a narrative concentrated on restricting human rights, the Government argued instead that in some key respects they haven’t gone far enough?
The pace of innovation is now so fast that the authorities have trouble keeping up with it.
What explains the persistence of littering when most other forms of anti-social behaviour are in decline?
“There is no absolutely no appreciation at all for the awful trauma the accused faces,” he explains.
It can be necessary to kill, in self-defence or war. But to do so after consideration with the potential victim under arrest? It’s an abuse of power.