The Prime Minister spells out the likely length that she desires for the period between Britain formally leaving the the EU and doing so in full effect.
David Lammy and the Social Mobility Commission both made a big splash on the basis of weak evidence and flawed assumptions.
Lady Hale offers ministers a double-edged sword when she suggests that they play a role in senior appointments to the bench.
The European Court of Justice has always played fast and loose with the law to drive forward EU integration.
Also: Unionists accuse Sinn Fein of ‘ploy’ over talks; prominent Cybernat arrested; Ulster court throws out gay marriage case; and more.
After we leave the EU, there will still be cross-border disputes that individuals and businesses need to settle.
The modern state is intended to restrain those who seek a monopoly on power. Such people naturally resent it when that system works.
Some of the criticisms of Sir Martin Moore-Bick have gone much too far, and seem to be attempts to make political points in the wake of a terrible tragedy.
Further details enclosed.
Further details enclosed.
Further details enclosed.
There are good reasons for placing all this in the “too difficult” box. But if Brexit was about anything, it was about sovereignty.
The Lord Chief Justice’s recent attack on the Lord Chancellor is unprecedented. Is she right for the job? Or is the job itself flawed?
Whatever the outcome, MPs and peers must be able to have their say in the lobbies.
It’s hard to see how hearings in front of MPs and peers would address the issues raised by those concerned about judicial activism.