Andrew Gimson’s PMQs sketch: Johnson sets out to infuriate his opponents
The pleasures of moral condemnation could distract the PM’s critics from replying to his arguments.
The pleasures of moral condemnation could distract the PM’s critics from replying to his arguments.
The Prime Minister’s first PMQs may not have generated much light – but it generated a lot of heat.
Jeremy Corbyn’s Surrender Bill won’t just delay Brexit. It threatens to stop it altogether.
Letwin versus Rees-Mogg, or Parliament versus the people.
But there is method in his madness.
But the odds of an early general election are shortening as each minute passes.
Unable to form a coherent alternative government, Johnson’s opponents place their hopes in yet another extension.
Some campaigners and commentators, particularly those who oppose Brexit, appear to have forgotten that this is a negotiation between the Government and the EU.
Look at what he says, whom he idolises and the ideology that runs through his movement, and it’s a troubling picture.
And just like Kennedy’s successor, he must match a serious time with a focus on delivery, not just promises.
“When otherwise sensible folk, holding down serious jobs, devise and propagate all manner of conspiracy theories, as well as insult Scottish Government analysts…”
“We will do everything necessary to stop a disastrous no-deal, for which this Government has no mandate.”
Since the Government believes the Yellowhammer leak details are out of date, it should publish an up-to-date assessment as soon as possible.
MPs are more likely to try other means of stopping a No Deal Brexit than holding a no confidence vote in Johnson’s Government.
Once again, Remainers are bolstering the separatists even as they lecture Brexiteers on the importance of the Union.