Within EFTA, there are already two models of relationship with the EU – the EEA and the Swiss model. There is no reason why there could not be a third.
Not being able to blame Brussels for our problems nor look to the EU for solutions will be immensely reinvigorating.
We don’t need a European solution; we need a global solution. We must think independent Anglosphere, not dependent Eurosphere.
They will want to ask themselves if they really want to spurn last year’s referendum result and the Party’s manifesto commitment.
For both sides, this is a new kind of deal-making. Although Britain is still a member, this is not an internal negotiation in which the UK can be outgunned and outvoted:
We are keen to gather views from interested parties (such as businesses, industry groups, politicians, academics and others) about what would happen.
We don’t need more laws with anti-strike provisions – the Government already has the tools to deal with the transport crisis.
My think-tank’s new report finds that there are over 46,000 unnecessary deaths each and every year in the UK.
Leadsom needs to start thinking now about establishing a system based on property rights.
To what problem is the EU a solution? The question is yet to be satisfactorily answered.
“For Britain, voting to leave will be a galvanising, liberating, empowering moment of patriotic renewal.”
Do people find sovereignty in a Parliament they regrettably take little interest in – or in actual power and the pound in their pocket: their job; their standard of living?
An exercise in demolition.
Learn a lesson from the European Free Trade Association, which includes Iceland and Switzerland. Its only purpose is promoting trade, not integration.
MPs have a chance to save money, improve justice and protect British citizens.