Taxpayers are going to have to pick up the bill for a pseudoscientific method that’s prejudiced in itself.
After the election, we suggested five ways of securing the Party’s electoral position. Eight months on, how is the Government doing?
The Prime Minister does not need to oversee every detail of the government himself – trapping politicians in Westminster will only burn them out.
The permanent crisis of the May years is not what holding the Government to account normally looks like.
They have sniffed below that beguiling surface a constitutional truffle of the kind they love to expose.
It was promised “in our first year”. Instead, there will be mini-commissions, and a push to reform a Government bugbear: judicial review.
Hoyle and Fowler are deeply opposed to the move, but Labour voters in the North of England like the sound of it.
We’ve learned nothing at all about his outlook but quite a lot about his capacities during the last tumultuous twelve months.
As a Party, we should hold out a helping hand to all those who still face the difficulties of daily life – who still cannot be their authentic selves.
For the Party to take it off him is one thing; for the Government to recast the committee, or try to, would be quite another.
The long-awaited Parliamentary Constituencies Bill will give voters fairer representation, and prevent political delay tactics.
Before any deals are signed, MPs should get to vote on them – as will be the case with the other parties.
The amendment to the Immigration Bill will be an opportunity to gauge the Party’s willingness to respect the liberties of the most excluded.
It seems to me there is truth on both sides of this argument. The nuances to which Lammy refers get lost once combat is joined.
For too many legislators, biffing the Prime Minister for a short-term thrill is the acme of political maturity.