The combination of a small majority, radical intent, a flow of power one way to Cabinet Ministers and another to key aides requires adjustment.
It’s difficult to reconcile the Prime Minister’s evident ambitions with the realities of her circumstances – and not obvious she’s trying to.
They will be strange, edgy experiences: I can hardly wait.
He has seamlessly made the transition from Cameron to May.
Hosting the 2025 Northern Powerhouse EXPO would be bigger than the Olympics and the World Cup combined.
Like May’s older-feeling government, America’s presidential candidates fit the demographic facts.
Opponents of grammar schools, some supporters of them, a slice of the independent sector, secularists…all have reason not to be best pleased with her plans.
The future of local government will depend on whether May opts for cautious pragmatism or visionary radicalism. So far there are hints of each.
The way British politics and planning mix tends to push infrastructure decisions into the long grass.
It’s predominately a tight-knit group of former staffers who’ve worked together before. No change there. But it has a more provincial and state school feel.
The Prime Minister and Hammond must choose between risks.
He supports single market membership and is unlikely to enthuse about an industrial strategy. Meet the man who could make or mar May’s premiership.
The salient point is that it is government intervention that raises the cost of living.
Brexit will allow us to decide on our own regional policy.
Osborne launches his new think-tank today, and the project that he championed will continue – though with differences.