The very last thing the tyrant would have done would be to restore sovereignty to Parliament.
The more he leaks, the slower May will be to put anything on the table. And the slower she is to do so, the slower the negotiation will proceed – from which everyone loses.
Regulation without representation would exacerbate the very lack of control that drove voters to choose Leave in the first place. It’s no solution at all.
Labour’s Shadow Brexit Secretary confims that there are no circumstances in which a Labour Government would pull the plug on negotiations.
It wouldn’t take much to bring our ports to a grinding halt. Here’s how we can plan ahead to secure smooth-running free trade as we leave the EU.
Of course taxes will be lower than under Corbyn. The question is whether they’ll be higher than they are now (already high).
I feel we have gone too far in publishing and overly political manifestos which make it difficult to govern subsequently.
The established parties have lost their grip on this contest, but their hold on other parts of the country’s system remains strong.
“I don’t want to see good Brexiteers – not fly-by-night or five-to-midnight ones – lost their seats and have Remainers in their place.”
British workers must be equipped for the task – especially since voters have sent a clear message about wanting stricter controls on immigration.
In her belief in “the good that government can do”, she is quite unique in terms of UK political post-war history.
Above all, don’t neglect the obvious. May is vulnerable to Tory revolts – as the NICs debacle proved. She wants a real working majority.
This proportion would be content to rely on WTO terms if necessary, or say that Single Market access isn’t important to them in the first place.
It makes spending commitments which exceed the amounts it budgets to spend. Those escalating commitments…will approach E250 billion by the time we leave.
The message is one of strong and stable leadership. But what does it actually mean?