The case against EU membership will not be won by procedural dodges. The No camp must concentrate on winning the argument.
Unnecessary and excessive EU regulation hampers the efforts of British businesses to compete.
It is bad enough that the EU undermines our democracy and harms our economy – but we also pay a fortune for the experience.
Today, we launch a five-part series on the case for Brexit on ConservativeHome.
Plus, why the voters of London would be lucky to have Syed Kamall as a mayoral candidate.
What does yesterday’s vote mean for British eurosceptics, for the Eurozone itself and for Cameron’s renegotiation?
Logic tells me there ought to be a negotiable compromise with the EU. Emotion makes me want to punch the Commission’s smug face.
His intervention deftly combined standing foursquare with David Cameron with reminding his audience that, when the referendum takes place, they may differ.
The Prime Minister was demanding “proper full-on treaty change”. Now we are told that we may have to accept a mere promise of it.
…which rather puts his support for a Yes vote into context.
Staying in the EU means growing risks our prosperity and freedom.
Even if they do cobble together a deal, it won’t be meaningful reform and it won’t be lasting. Which leaves Out as the only option.
Cameron doesn’t care very much about Europe either way, so the idea he’d split the Tories to keep us in it is completely out of keeping with his character.
If Eurosceptics concentrate their energies on renegotiation, the case for In will be halfway round the country before Out has got its boots on.
Ninety per cent think exempting UK businesses from EU regulation would have a positive effect.