Nadhim Zahawi MP: The security case for renewable energy, with back-up from small-scale nuclear and gas
Events in the Middle East and Russia have shown why we need to reduce our dependence on politically volatile parts of the world.
Events in the Middle East and Russia have shown why we need to reduce our dependence on politically volatile parts of the world.
My study of it produced disappointing results.
Politically repressive, religiously moderate, pro-capitalist in thinking and ex-communist in feel, the country is bound up with British jobs, interests and prosperity.
Like a latter-day Gladstone, the former Environment Secretary has come among us unmuzzled.
Security and stable prices are best achieved by concentrating on one or two areas and doing them well.
The latter need to ask themselves: when did they become the thing they most hate in the world. When did they become LibDems?
Russia has invaded Ukraine – what can we do about it?
We wouldn’t be searching for oil in dangerous and difficult areas like the Arctic if there was enough of it coming from more accessible fields.
It is at the cross-roads of the Shia-Sunni conflict, yet remains outside of it. It is a majority Muslim country, but with a history of peaceful co-existence.
Thanks to ministerial high-handedness, local people are about as well disposed to fracking as the average landless peasant was to the Enclosure Acts
The fact that so little has changed in the intervening years, despite all Russia has done, is depressing.
The vast majority of concerns are either false or can be addressed by competent regulation.
Of the 210,000 people who have had Green Deal Assessments, just 12,000 have gone on to actually make their homes more environmentally friendly under the scheme.
Stamping oil and gas wells all over the British countryside is going to lose votes – and for what gain?
These elections are your free hit against a deeply complacent and craven establishment that is wedded to outdated ideas that are failing the British people.