The Hinkley Point debate reveals that indecision has its price, too
For decades, Governments allowed British nuclear expertise to atrophy, and refused to make decisions about new capacity.
For decades, Governments allowed British nuclear expertise to atrophy, and refused to make decisions about new capacity.
By allowing biomass a level playing field to compete, ministers could save taxpayers billions of pounds and make the UK energy grid more secure.
Following this strategy could lead to weaker returns, leaving older local people, teachers, healthcare workers and so on with less in their pockets.
Hydrogen fuel, produced by environmentally-friendly methods, could eliminate carbon emissions with minimal disruption to our economy or lifestyle.
Would any politician dare to arrive at a summit and say “Actually, I’m here with the interests of my electorate in mind?”
Our white goods will speak to the smart meter so the dishwasher, washing machine or tumble drier is waiting to spring to life at the most favourable tariff.
It’s the Government’s biggest infrastructure programme – but few have heard of it.
Years of drift and bad policy have left the UK with a tattered energy policy.
There is neither need nor rationale for rolling back our low-carbon policies.
Closing old, unreliable, and highly polluting plants is the cheapest way of ensuring security of supply, cleaning up our air, and tackling climate change.
National Grid is already using ‘last resort’ measures to keep the lights on.
We ought to encourage energy self-sufficiency to protect against international instability.
The lack of UK content specified in major projects is costing economy dearly in terms of lost jobs and business, and it’s unacceptable for the Government to stand idly by.
The Government can wean solar power off subsidies and empower consumers – but must be careful not to undo its good work to date.
Our findings confirm that – as one would intuitively expect – these stocks are crucial to the construction of risk-balanced portfolios.