A visa programme for experienced fishermen from outside the EEA would throw a lifeline to an industry which is vital to many coastal communities.
The Chancellor has not always been well treated by his neighbour, and deserves support over public spending. But he has mishandled his internal position over Brexit.
Most people in both camps are interested in getting the best outcome starting from where we are. Here’s how.
A six-year move from referendum vote to full sovereignty, rather than a sudden ripping away of all ties, is surely what a successful departure looks like.
They will want to ask themselves if they really want to spurn last year’s referendum result and the Party’s manifesto commitment.
Having attacked EEA membership as a bad deal during the referendum, they now pretend it is a good idea in the hope of preventing Brexit.
This is because in order to maximise opportunities, we must have control over our tariff schedules and our domestic regulation.
She points to the opportunities to imitate New Zealand agriculture, and to crack down on big businesses which evade tax.
Detoxifying the Party never meant moving to the left – this year’s manifesto was well to the left economically of anything we advocated.
For all the chatter about the Customs Union, leaving the EU in full is still on course. But May’s bungled election has raised the chances of a disorderly outcome.
There are some risks to trade, but they should be rationalised and addressed rather than overhyped.
EURATOM, WTO quotas, open skies agreements, banks’ ability to lend – all these involve change which it may not be possible to effect by April 2019.