Next Tory Leader run-offs. 8) Raab 52 per cent, Gove 36 per cent.
We scarcely need to make the point again. Our Party members’ panel is backing the candidate, in any run-off, least associated with the Prime Minister’s policy.
We scarcely need to make the point again. Our Party members’ panel is backing the candidate, in any run-off, least associated with the Prime Minister’s policy.
This completes a disappointing set of results for Javid, who beat Gove for top slot when we held run-offs last summer.
A pattern is emerging whereby the contender least associated with the Government gets more support than the other.
Again, note that neither candidate has over half the total. Over one in five of our Party member panel respondents would abstain.
The abstention rate plummets to under ten per cent once a non-Cabinet member who voted Leave in 2016 is offered to the panel.
The easiest course for 1922 Executive Committtee members to take is to put a decision off. Here’s why that should be avoided.
The former Cabinet minister, who went to prison for perjury, explains why, as a prison chaplain, he is happier than he has ever been.
Also: Dugdale wins lawsuit against cybernat blogger; devolution row as English hospitals shut out Welsh patients over funding; and a week in SNP bad news.
Plus: What would it take to get the Cabinet leavers to resign? Clarke’s Maastricht Treaty Customs Union moment. And: in defence of Robbie Gibb.
Also: May cites absurd fears about ‘direct rule’ to justify abandonment of No Deal; Tory rebels wooed separatist votes; and polls open in Newport West.
Next time round, we will try run-offs between some of the main candidates, which are a bit ovedue.
The former Brexit Secretary argues that this is the responsible thing to do to avoid a no-deal exit and ensure the UK leaves the EU.
Such as: do you see Brexit as a help or a hindrance – and what’s your vision for our post-Leave country?
Hers or Letwins? That’s what the choice is narrowing down to. From the point of view of trust in politics, how MPs vote will now make little difference – if any.
The idea might suit the leadership aspirations of some potential successors. But wishful thinking and stubborn reality don’t mix – at least not in this case.