Daniel Hannan: We will get a good deal – because rational self-interest will overcome the Eurocrats’ fury
While Tusk and Barnier fume, the member states sound rather more emollient.
While Tusk and Barnier fume, the member states sound rather more emollient.
Only in a place or time where you hadn’t witnessed the effects on people of a lack of choice might you be willing to countenance it yourself.
Are we seeing a convulsion as great as 1968 – or even 1848?
I hope that in the electoral battle that lies ahead ahead, a fresh-faced volunteer will stand on the streets of Quito, and pose questions in a refined Liverpool accent.
Not only do such deals routinely end up permanent, but striking one would require continued loss of control over our borders.
Despite progress in some countries, fewer are free than 20 years ago. Does Trump have a practicable plan – or any at all – to help turn the tables worldwide?
Perhaps the 60 million Americans who backed him simply thought other factors were more important. But is that judgement bigoted in itself?
“There is no force on earth that brings people together like the voluntary exchange of goods and services.”
The political class must respond to revolutionaries’ demands or face further defeats.
It’s easy, even comforting, to stick a simple narrative onto the election result. But it would be a mistake.
If we want to control our laws, our economy and our trade agreements, we cannot stay in either arrangement.
The only way to reconcile our different political desires peacefully is through the compromises inherent in representative democracy.
The 5.6 million of our fellow countrymen living overseas are a huge source of “soft power” – we should not be insulting them.
Either he would be turfed out of Parliament, or his constituents would shrug and say “So what?”
We would need help and support restructuring our civil service and our military. London should offer Ankara that assistance.