Williamson’s new defence policy will be meaningless without funding
It’s one thing to recognise the long-term threats posed by states such as Russia, quite another to meet them.
It’s one thing to recognise the long-term threats posed by states such as Russia, quite another to meet them.
After years of defence cuts and maybe more to come, we must ask whether the Armed Forces are properly equipped to keep Britain safe.
“If the priority becomes avoiding new cooperation with a country outside the EU, then this will have damaging real world consequences for the security of all our people.”
Doing so would be an opportunity for us to learn – Ukrainian forces have valuable experience of state-to-state conflict, and of Russian weaponry we have never faced.
If you don’t like what the Treasury’s up to, criticise the Chancellor, who’s accountable for it – not those who work for him, who aren’t.
The Chancellor is opposing Government policy, he laments – before calling for more defence spending, and praising “wonderful, forthright, gutsy” Claire Perry.
During the Cold War being ‘strong on defence’ was a potent vote winner, and the money flowed accordingly.
Which is what she hinted at after the last one – and which would ease the pressures on her and help get the government back on its feet.
The President insists that he and the Prime Minister ‘like each other a lot’.
Brexit has transformed the context in which we plan our security. Commitments to our European neighbours and Global Britain require more money.
Our plan seems to have been little more than to cobble together just enough kit to make us a Great Power on the cheap. That cannot continue.
Tactical newspaper articles are necessary but insufficient. She should make a series of speeches to set out her stall and try to change the weather.
That means defending NATO from encroachment by an EU army, and supporting Central and Eastern European countries in staying out of the Euro.
Not only are we helping the Kingdom achieve important domestic reforms, it gives us a platform to project our influence in this vital region.
And we will have one for Hammond, for what it’s worth, if the armed forces are refused further cash that they need.