The new Prime Minister will inherit the worst political legacy in living memory – with the very barest of working majorities.
Posts Tagged: Charlie Elphicke MP
We took ads on Facebook to trumpet our town’s success stories. It also helped that the local MP is recognised to be fighting for Brexit.
Mostly ERG-aligned Leavers – but roughly ten former Remainers, a core of whom now back a second referendum.
He and others should resign their seats, and then face their voters if they wish, when they join a new political party – but not before.
The Government should back these sensible plans. We must avoid a repeat of the disruption on the roads that took place in 2015.
Seeking to extend transition after all, thus re-raising the possibility of being stuck in it, or going ahead without proper systems in place would be an unacceptable choice.
May should not shirk from seeking an election over her manifesto pledge to leave it. But we are not there yet – not nearly.
Red Ted Knight and the then Militant Tendency were a disaster for Lambeth. The hard left has returned – new bottles, yet very much the nastiest of old wine.
Which is what she hinted at after the last one – and which would ease the pressures on her and help get the government back on its feet.
Some would-be rebels switched sides at the last minute, while at least three others abstained.
The moral that many of his colleagues will quietly draw is that you cannot rely on the Conservative Party to treat you fairly if you run into trouble.
Plus: How many letters has Brady had? The tragedy of the death of Carl Sargeant. And: introducing my new podcast with Jacqui Smith.
James Arnell: Ready on Day One for Brexit. 1) Money. If there’s no deal, and the EU fails to play fair, we shouldn’t pay it a penny.
I would propose that we pay a total of €12 billion as our “divorce bill” – even if there’s no FTA. But subject to three conditions.
Charlie Elphicke: “We should insure against the risk of error.” His Commons speech on Brexit contingency: full text.
“I have a response to the naysayers who say that it would be wrong to invest now. I say that it would be wrong to wait until the last moment.”
It would be prudent for that to become the presumption. Even if we do end up with a deal, infrastructure improvements will be welcome.