
David Gauke: This Government has a problem with the rule of law. And the threat to it now comes from the Right.
One controversy may be considered to be a misfortune, two looks like carelessness and three suggests a pattern of behaviour.
One controversy may be considered to be a misfortune, two looks like carelessness and three suggests a pattern of behaviour.
The Environment Secretary, in charge of the seven-year transition from the Common Agricultural Policy, prefers to do good by stealth.
In memory of the author of “Republican Party Reptile”, who showed why our economic system won the Cold War.
Lord Agnew’s account of why he decided he must go has not had the attention it deserves.
The British are deluged with sanctimonious propaganda about the need to save the planet, and China goes on burning coal.
The sparing of Rhodes’s statue, and the rows at Jesus College Cambridge and the National Trust, suggest conservatives are fighting back.
The proposals published today to make England the first country to end new cases of HIV fit within a Tory tradition of pragmatic health policy.
At the final meeting of her Cabinet, a revived Iron Lady told members, during a coffee break, that “on no account must Heseltine be elected”
Plus: virtual conferences are the way of the future. America’s vice-presidential debate worked. And: Fox deserved better from his WTO campaign.
His critics display the close-mindedness that they falsely suspect in him. Indeed, you won’t find a less partisan man.
Dacre has said that he “would die in a ditch defending it as a great civilising force”, and Moore grasps the Corporation’s original Reithian mission.
The Corporation has lost its grip on its Reithian inheritance – which, for all his criticism of the BBC, the former Telegraph editor understands.
In Claire Fox, the Prime Minister has elevated to the peerage someone whose former party defended terrorism.
The list tries to bridge the Brexit divide. But will Fox, who supported the IRA campaign which killed several Tory MPs, be a bridge too far?
A new history of the magazine, which has just celebrated its 10,000th issue, relates how successive editors showed their “hatred of shams”.