Three tests that the Conservative Party’s inquiry into the Clarke allegations must pass
It will clearly be unsatisfactory if Lord Feldman and others are not interviewed at all, and that he himself will submit evidence to people who report to him.
It will clearly be unsatisfactory if Lord Feldman and others are not interviewed at all, and that he himself will submit evidence to people who report to him.
The Party Board should ensure that the issues at stake are addressed with a credibility that is presently absent.
His departure follows claims that he failed to act to prevent bullying by Mark Clarke.
The Clarkegate allegations have revealed flawed accountability structures and failures of confidentiality – exacerbated by a fixation with the short-term.
Plus: a tough week for Howlett. Sleepless nights for Feldman and Shapps. And: The absurd Harris-Quinney resurfaces.
The Conservatives for Britain Co-Chairman asks 24 questions about possible breaches of the Party Board’s decision to remain neutral.
Without a report, closure won’t happen. The claims will simply get bigger and louder.
To do so would be a breach of the Party’s agreed neutrality, an abuse of his access to Tory donors, and a grave disservice to ordinary members.
The new rules clarify when and how special advisers can engage in political activity, but come too late for those needlessly punished for the old system’s shortcomings.
There are reasons why it was much lower than Labour’s – perhaps even why it was lower than last time round. None the less, CCHQ needs to take a long hard look at it.
We propose a natural extension of the successful 40:40 strategy deployed during the recent General Election.
Does this result reflect anything more than the usual reflex suspicion of CCHQ?
Frankly, we need to get through all this without a split. Resources neutrality is essential to that end.
They agree with our columnist, Paul Abbott.
Plus: We need to care more for our candidates post-election. And: A recruiting brainwave from Conor Burns.