It comes down to whether people feel that the outcome has delivered May’s goal that the UK should “regain control of our own money, our own laws and our own borders”.
Selling off the Royal Bank of Scotland without taking the chance to widen share ownership would be a wasted opportunity.
As Conservatives, we have a duty to protect and defend people who have historically been left without access to legal credit.
Overall, our new report suggests that public attitudes towards immigration – and indeed leaving the EU – are not fuelled by racism or intolerance.
Thousands of businesses have suffered material harm as a result of sharp practice against which they have no recourse.
Let’s have Policy Board outside of the constraints of the Government machine – and a commission on what Britain should look like post-Brexit.
The origin of this toxic US mortgage lending was Bill Clinton’s extension of the Community Redevelopment Act, designed to encourage minority home ownership.
The absence of a trade agreement with the EU should not concern us – there are swift, practical ways to overcome possible issues.
The Prime Minister’s manifesto will have its flaws, but she has grasped the implications of Brexit more surely than any other senior politician.
The former fear that it will revive what they believe are business-unfriendly ideas about foreign takeovers and workers on boards.
Westminster is streets ahead of most boardrooms in dealing with intense media scrutiny.
We should take the opportunity to remind ourselves what real progress means and rededicate ourselves to its cause.
The core of their beliefs is that elite expertise is preferred and believed superior to messier concepts such as the market or democracy.
The Government must try to build from the essentials out – security, legal certainty, frictionless trade. Zero tariffs would be the icing on the cake.
We are keen to gather views from interested parties (such as businesses, industry groups, politicians, academics and others) about what would happen.