Mark Winterburn: We must build better, as well as more, homes
We sometimes forget the downside of Macmillan’s legacy – rushed housing that later cost a fortune to put right.
We sometimes forget the downside of Macmillan’s legacy – rushed housing that later cost a fortune to put right.
If we want a competitive economy and fair taxation, we need to simplify the tax code – not give HMRC arbitrary powers which invite abuse.
We should draw up plans for free trade among the nine major powers, and free movement among the Anglosphere.
It can be done, but it requires a great deal of political ambition.
The real motivation of those backing them is to bind the hands of the Government; to try to find a way to keep us in the EU; or else to delay our departure.
OECD analysis indicates that the cost of childcare as a percentage of income for a two-earner family is now the highest in the developed world.
Our university system is not producing enough at present, and the Government’s proposed reforms threaten to produce even fewer.
We have a legal and a moral duty to protect them. The President’s order feels like an attack on our shared humanity.
This move risks forfeiting British leadership in a strategic sector for no obvious benefit at all.
Too much land is left vacant, and too many developments completed slowly so as not to lower house prices. Councils need more power to take action.
In Government, Labour built on the work of George Young in doing so. Now it’s time for some cross-party co-operation in reverse.
According to new data from the respected British Social Attitudes survey, referenced in our new report, support in England for new homes has almost doubled since 2010,
Democrats, meanwhile, are still searching for a response.
The report I have been working on over the past year will provide the Government with a clear strategy to help tackle rough sleeping.
We can build a Britain that is fair on immigration, trades globally and is outward-looking – underpinned by great values of equality, fairness and freedom.