we launched the Conservative Friends of Russia, a group
for those with an interest in Russian politics, history, business and culture.
Our aim is to improve relations between the two countries, provide a forum for
open debate and help to inform decision making in business and politics.
absolutely understood that we were embarking on a controversial project that
many would try to strangle at birth. And we were right! However, in contrast to
the comments of armchair critics on Twitter who have not attended our events,
my inbox is bursting with positive messages of support from attendees of all
backgrounds – students, businesses, MPs, charities and cultural organisations.
Many media outlets have praised our bravery in tackling a thorny but necessary
subject. Certainly, our membership has expanded rapidly in the last few days.
there is no such thing as bad publicity, but I confess I have been astonished
and deeply disappointed by some of the things written after the launch, several by
people I had hoped for better from.
certainly a difficult time to be launching such a group, given some political
decisions in Russia that may seem alien to us. But it is simply ludicrous to
attempt to tie entirely separate and independent events together in some James
Bond-style conspiracy theory.
who has organised an event of the nature we held last Tuesday will know how much
work and advanced preparation go into it. It takes months of planning, which is
clearly detached from decisions taken thousands of miles away outside of our
control. Indeed my bad habit of hoarding emails reveals that I first spoke with
CCHQ about the creation of CFoR in November 2010, before anyone outside of
Russia had heard of Pussy Riot!
I and the
rest of the executive team have worked extremely hard to get the group up and running,
each of us on a voluntary basis on the side of full time jobs. Our organisation
is entirely membership based and has received no donations or sponsorship. Our
financial situation was such that we each paid for our own business cards
whilst the cost of things like the website came out of our own pockets. It is
beyond parody for some in the media to suggest that we are some sort of
Oligarch-funded infiltration device.
to describe us as pro-Putin is pure nonsense. Our website and all of our literature
has always made it extremely clear that we are a neutral forum for debate. Our
membership contains a mix of people and opinions, and I think that’s fantastic.
I personally love having a good discussion with someone I disagree with – it
opens the mind and encourages critical thinking. What matters to me is not the
opinion formed by an individual or whether I agree with it, but that they have
reached it through consideration of full facts and information rather than
ignorance. Unfortunately, some reactions have shown a remarkable degree of
ignorance and blatant disregard of the truth.
In one of
the more ridiculous episodes, it was reported that our Honorary President, the
extremely established and reputable Sir Malcolm Rifkind MP had pulled out of
the event at fifteen minutes' notice, fearing bad publicity. Nowhere at any time
had it been said he was due to attend. Indeed, I was well aware that he was in
Scotland all summer (amongst other things, he is due to speak at the
Scotland-Russia Forum this month). This was independently verified by a
journalist, but his cancellation was reported as fact on the basis that "two
people at the event had said so". Well, I’ve had two people in my life tell me
that the moon is made of cheese, and I look forward to that being a front page
astounded by the suggestion that there shouldn’t be a Conservative Friends of
Russia. We must remember that being a friend of a country and its people is not
the same as being a friend of its government. By that reckoning, none of us
would have been Friends of Britain between 1997 and 2010 and the entire
population is to blame for the "dodgy dossier" and the expenses scandal.
How would we all feel about having our individual political opinions discarded
by the world on the basis that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown clearly represent us
about 300,000 people of Russian descent in Britain, and I’ll tell you a
secret… they don’t all work for the FSB! Increasingly in need of the finances
brought by foreign students, British universities welcome 20,000 Russians a year,
and they’re not all spies! Not every attractive Russian female in a good job is
just a honeytrap! Arsenal fans didn’t petition Arsene Wenger about human rights
when he signed Andrei Arshavin, nor did Chelsea fans abandon their team in
disgust when it was bought by Roman Abramovich.
143 million people – among them prosperous businesspeople, distinguished
academics and cultural icons – by the actions of the few is simply insane. Some
of the prejudice that has been spouted in recent weeks simply wouldn’t be
acceptable and would lead to serious consequences if said about any other
country or group of people.
consider other ‘Friends of…’ groups on the scene. Within the Conservative
Party we have Israel, hardly the least controversial of countries and whose actions sometimes even its own leaders disagree on; Pakistan, a country with
its own major political problems and accusations of links to terrorism; India,
which struggles with mass poverty alongside serious corruption; and Azerbaijan,
whose free-wine-drinking guests at their excellent conference parties probably
don’t even know its capital city, let alone the criticisms of it by Amnesty
International and Human Rights Watch. In the Labour Party there are Friends of
Palestine, Colombia and Venezuela. Should we ban all of these groups or look to
them as worthy vehicles for helping such countries to improve and
we like it or not – and I know a lot of people don’t like it – Russia is a
major player on the international scene and its importance is only going to
increase. It has one of the world’s largest economies and is bursting with
natural resources at a time when our economy is struggling and our energy prices
are rising. Ignoring and refusing to engage with it would be akin to cutting
our nose off to spite our face.
So let us welcome such groups and encourage the
wealth of attitudes and opinions that are on offer. After all, we’re a liberal
democracy, aren’t we?
> Last week, ConservativeHome carried an article by Garvan Walshe attacking the idea of a Conservative Friends of Russia group.