The image below appeared in this week’s New Statesman.
I’ve just spoken to Paul Goodman MP in the
Davis campaign and he’s unable to blog today as had been expected.
Fortunately he was able to put me in touch with J R R Tolkien who has
stepped into the breach at the last minute. Given recent discussion of Cameron as Frodo and Davis as Aslan, the Professor’s letter has arrived at a very timely moment…
"Dear Mr Montgomerie,
I read that a comparison is being drawn between the political campaign
currently being undertaken by David Cameron and the quest which was
undertaken by Frodo Baggins in my work “The Lord of the Rings”.
In particular, I am informed that Mr Cameron is compared with Frodo;
Boris Johnson with Sam; Michael Gove and George Osborne with Merry and
Pippin; Oliver Letwin with Gandalf; Gordon Brown with Sauron, and David
Davis with Gollum.
Furthermore, I distinctly heard a participant on this morning’s “Today”
programme compare Mr Davis with Aslan, a lion who appears in Chronicles
of Narnia, a work written by my fellow Inkling, Professor C S Lewis.
I wish to make the following observations:
1) As readers of my work know, Frodo offers the ring of power to
Gandalf. I am unaware that Mr Cameron attempted to withdraw from
nomination as leader of the Conservative Party while simultaneously
offering to nominate Mr Letwin for that position. Frodo also offers
the ring to Galadriel. I have no knowledge of any offer made by Mr
Cameron to Theresa May. May I add that, in my view, Galadriel was most
unwise to refer to Bilbo Baggins’ long-expected party as “the nasty
party”. Her comments have proved extremely damaging to the morale of
ordinary hobbit workers on the ground, or rather under it.
2) As readers also know, Sam is compelled to borrow the ring from
Frodo, and later returns it. I am not convinced that Mr Johnson would
return the premiership to Mr Cameron on demand.
3) The comparison between Gollum and Mr Davis (or Smeagol) seems to me
a little wide of the mark. Gollum, remember, has previously possessed
the ring. If the comparison of which I have read is to be applied
accurately, Gollum must surely be a former Prime Minister who believes
that he (or perhaps she) has been unjustly deprived of office, but will
in due course be reinstated in 10 Downing Street. It would be
impertinent of me to speculate about the identity of such a person or
persons, and I must therefore leave any necessary identification in the
hands of your readers.
4) The comparison identifies Oliver Letwin as Gandalf. It does not,
however, identify a Saruman. Mr Letwin’s Shadow Cabinet colleague
David Willetts is clearly also a wizard, but any identification of Mr
Willetts with Saruman is deeply problematic. Saruman, after all, goes
over to the Dark Lord – in this instance, Gordon Brown. It is true
that Mr Willetts refused to nominate Frodo for the leadership. But
there is nothing in Mr Willetts’ character or outlook to suggest that
he will cross the floor of the Commons to join New Labour. A more apt
identification, perhaps, is with the late Enoch Powell, who urged
hobbits to “Vote Mordor” during the 1974 general election, arguing that
the identify of Rivendell was threatened by an uncontrolled influx of
elves and dwarves.
5) Mention of Rivendell leads me, finally, to the Council of Elrond.
The comparison does not refer to the council. At first glance, the
council would appear to be modelled on the weekly meeting of the 1922
committee – for men in grey suits, read elves in grey robes. It has
been put to me that the council cannot be confused with the 1922
committee, since the council actually reaches a decision. I naturally
reject this argument, preferring instead to note that the council is
not a meeting of hobbits only, but of a wide variety of different
peoples. In summary, the council is nothing less than a potential
coalition government. Is Legolas a Liberal Democrat? Is Gimli a
Scottish Nationalist? Is Mr Cameron planning a potential deal with
Mark Oaten? I think we should be told.
Finally, may I offer sincere apologies to all your readers. Though
myself the author of a work of fantasy, I confess that it is deeply
depressing to find that some Conservatives (with Members of Parliament
apparently among their number) are incapable of leaving childhood and
of growing up. They attempt to escape the harsh reality of adulthood.
They retreat into a comforting world of adolescent invention. In
saying so, I am not of course referring in any way whatsoever to the
political aspirations of those associated with either the Cameron or
Davis leadership campaigns.