Published:

5 comments

On yesterday’s ToryDiary we highlighted Peter Lilley MP’s idea to link his and his colleagues’ remuneration to their failure or success at transferring powers to the EU.  Posted below are some highlights from Mr Lilley’s speech in the House of Commons yesterday.

MPs’ pay should reflect their responsibilities: "In virtually every occupation, it is recognised that pay should reflect responsibilities. If people receive more responsibilities, they get higher pay. If they move to a post with fewer responsibilities, they expect to receive lower pay. The same should be true of Parliament. If, as is contemplated under the Bill that deals with the European constitutional treaty, this House hands over more of its powers to European institutions, MPs’ remuneration should reflect that diminution of their responsibilities. If, on the other hand, as my right hon. Friend the Leader of the Opposition has promised, Parliament regains some powers, such as those over social and employment policies that were conceded in the Amsterdam treaty, that should be reflected positively when MPs’ pay is assessed."

So many UK powers have already been transferred to the EU: "The German Government estimate that more than 80 per cent. of German laws are now decided at a European level. Our own Trade Minister has admitted that “around half of all UK legislation with an impact on business, charities and the voluntary sector stems from legislation agreed by Ministers in Brussels.”… The total scale of EU legislation is enormous. Last year, the EU passed 177 directives, which are more or less equivalent to our Acts of Parliament, and 2,033 regulations, which become directly enforceable in this place, not to mention 1,045 decisions. Even that huge tally ignores the extent to which our powers are diminished by our inability to do things that we would like to do because they would conflict with European law. When I was a Minister, officials would frequently say, “No, Minister, you can’t do that”, because something was within the exclusive competence of the European Union."

This Bill may concentrate a few Euro-enthusiasts’ minds: "My Bill is designed to provide a wake-up call whenever we risk going further down that route, although I accept that it has little chance of becoming law in this Parliament. Those who support the transfer of power from here to supranational institutions should logically accept that our pay should reflect the diminution of our responsibilities. But, strangely, all the Euro-enthusiasts whom I asked to sponsor the Bill declined to do so without explaining why. Too many Members are happy to avert their eyes from what is happening, so long as they retain the prestige and emoluments that were appropriate to a fully sovereign Parliament. Turkeys do not vote for Christmas."

MORE HERE.

5 comments for: Peter Lilley proposes link between MPs’ pay and the transfer of UK powers to the EU

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.