Published:

13 comments

Nick_gulliford
Nick Gulliford says Councils run registry offices but don’t make the best use of this responsibility.

Those interested in this subject may like to see – now or later – what I wrote at Conservative Home Platform under, "The Government could be doing much more to encourage strong relationships". The excellent news since then has been the announcement during her speech to the Conservative Party Conference on 30th September by Maria Miller MP, Shadow Minister for the Family:

"Most young couples now get married in a civil ceremony. Unlike a church wedding, there is no tradition of pre-marriage preparation for couples marrying at a registry office. We want that to change. We want local registrars to start signposting couples to pre-marital education as a matter of routine. The Local Government Association who co-ordinate the role of wedding registrars, agree and I am pleased to say that they [are] putting forward this policy so that every young couple getting married will be made aware of the benefits they would get from relationship support at this critical point in their life. In the US, couples who have this type of pre-marriage education are a third less likely to divorce. We want this type of support for couples to be routine in Britain too."

For several years the government has ostensibly supported this stance
too; the last record that I have is from the Children’s Services
Branch, Education, Training & Culture Team, HM Treasury, 24 June
2004:

“The Government continues to be committed to providing
support and guidance to couples entering marriages, including secular
ceremonies, as well as those who are already married. Indeed, some
local authorities are already delivering some services, participating
voluntarily in marriage preparation work with the co-operation of local
registration practitioners. This was acknowledged in ‘Civil
Registration: Delivering Vital Change’."

However, no attempt has been made by the government to encourage local
councils to engage with or develop this service. Harry Phibbs compiled
a list of 100 questions councillors should ask council officers to which I have added five more:

  1. Does the council have a policy for domestic and social cohesion? 
     
  2. What steps has the council taken to monitor changes by
    neighbourhood in the married/divorced ratio, domestic violence, teenage
    pregnancy, abortion, single parents, children in care, truancy etc.
  3. Do registrars signpost couples to research-based relationship education courses and pre-marital inventories.
  4. Are the register offices equipped with Internet terminals to
    facilitate connections with voluntary groups and Internet based services.
  5. To what extent does the council promote its policy for domestic and social cohesion through libraries and local advertising
     

I hope very much this will become a move towards publishing a ‘Social
Capital Index’ by neighbourhood as a monitoring device [which will be
at least as significant as GDP and RPI], and that signposting by
registrars to relationship education – along the lines outlined by
Maria Miller MP – will be implemented now by local authorities in
conjunction with voluntary groups.

13 comments for: What Councils could do to promote marriage

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.