By Peter Hoskin
Follow Peter on Twitter

year, another TUC conference, another round of dire speculation about a general
strike. You see, the unions are going to debate a motion put forward by the
Prison Officers’ Association, calling for “co-ordinated action with
far-reaching campaigns, including the consideration and practicalities of a
general strike”. If it actually happened, it would be the first strike of that
magnitude since 1926.

let’s not get over-excited: as the Telegraph’s Dan Hodges points
, a general strike is an unlikely prospect. For starters, mulling over
the “practicalities” is some distance from heading out on to the streets,
placards in hand, to wage industrial action that many union bosses and members
are inclined against.* And then there’s the example of last November’s dispute,
which was heralded as a general strike but reduced into a one-day affair which
saw only a small proportion of union members militating against the government.

neither should we underestimate the rise of union militancy since the Coalition
was born. In fact, last year saw a four-fold increase in the number of working
days lost to labour disputes from the year before. The total number of working
days lost, 1.4 million, was the highest since 1990 (although that figure is,
admittedly, dwarfed by, say, the 4 million reached in 1989):

Working days lost to labour disputes

year, the number of working days lost to labour disputes stood at 190,000 in
the period up until the end of June (the most recent month for which figures
are available). This is less than for the corresponding period in 2011, but if
there’s just another month like last November — as some of the unions are
threatening — then it could be the first time since 1989-90 that two consecutive
years have topped the 1 million figure for days lost to strikes.

all this, of course, at a time of deep economic unease, which was never the
case for those strikes struck in the New Labour years. If the PCS union’s pre-Olympics
made the government more eager to reform strike laws, then the
state of the economy should double the effect. I’ll surprised if this isn’t one
of the leitmotifs of the forthcoming party conference.

* Conservatives oughtn’t forget the
plurality of the union movement

Comments are closed.