By Matt Sinclair of The TaxPayers' Alliance.
Yesterday, LeftWatch followed up
on its attack on the taxpayer-funded Family and Parenting Institute's
intervention in the political debate over whether marriage should be
recognised in the tax system. Ed West, at the Telegraph, has argued
that taxpayer funded campaigning 'charities' should have their funding
cut. The new blog asked "What other taxpayer funded charities should
lose their welfare cheques?"
(PDF), which contains a nice big list of taxpayer funded campaigns to
cut. That report argued that, as well as introducing a law emulating
the American restriction on the use of taxpayers' money to hire
lobbyists, the Conservatives should cut funding from the following
groups, which are primarily political campaigns or pressure groups:
- The Local Government Association – £14.8 million
- The NHS Confederation – £7.0 million
- The Association of Police Authorities – £1.4 million
so the figures above are only the membership subscription fees from
public sector organisations paying for representation).
Campaigns for health policy and lifestyle changes
- Alcohol Concern – £515,000
- Sustain – £380,508
- National Heart Forum – £315,000
- Action on Smoking and Health – £191,000
- Living Streets – £150,000
- Family Planning Association (fpa) – £130,000
- Alliance House Foundation and the Institute for Alcohol Studies – £76,236
- Consensus Action on Salt and Health – £23,500
- The Sustainable Development Commission – £4.1 million
- The Forum for the Future – £1.6 million
- The Campaign for Better Transport (Transport 2000) – £417,210
- The Climate Group – £186,523
- Friends of the Earth – £153,994
- The Green Alliance – £137,120
- UK Public Health Association – £84,090
- People and Planet – £73,833
- Women's Environmental Network – £25,725
- The Islamic Foundation for Ecology and Environmental Sciences – £3,500
- New Economics Foundation – £601,518
- Demos – £553,004
- The Institute for Public Policy Research – £350,330
- The New Local Government Network – £117,972
There you go, a list of twenty-five groups to get the
next Government started. There is more detail on all of them in the
report, including details of how they spent our money.
need to be avoid any accusation of ideological bias though, and
while none of our FOIs for the report came back with funding to
centre-right groups, it was worrying to see a number of joint fringe
meetings organised by centre right think-tanks and taxpayer funded
groups in Manchester this year (such joint meetings at party
conferences often come with substantial funding attached). No doubt
we'll find out more about that when we repeat this exercise next year.
funded lobbying and political campaigning is undemocratic and distorts
decision making in deeply pernicious ways, as we set out in our report.
There is a lot of it going on and, with the public finances tight, it
should clearly be cut.