Towards a Charter for Party Reform
The row over the Prime Minister’s remarks about local Associations has been mostly concocted. But the need for Party reform is real. We open a ConHome series.
The row over the Prime Minister’s remarks about local Associations has been mostly concocted. But the need for Party reform is real. We open a ConHome series.
First things first: Party members need more of a say on how money raised is spent.
What he now needs to do is to handle the coming plebiscite fairly – and here’s how.
The Chair of Conservatives for Reform in Europe replies to Paul Goodman’s article of last week arguing the opposite.
We want to ensure that you are not arbitrarily held back because of the colour of your skin, your sexuality or your religious beliefs.
We speak to ten of them.
We conducted it in the wake of his renegotiation and the draft deal.
The sooner all concerned grasp this, the better.
It is a vital piece of legislation which, crucially, has drawn widespread support from a diverse range of people and organisations.
Banning the direct state subsidy of third-sector lobbying is welcome, but will be meaningless without measures to prevent indirect subsidy.
Has the renegotiation plan changed your mind? If so, in which direction?
They are using them as a tool for their campaign about public finances.
Ministers have a course to follow if they don’t like Cameron’s draft EU deal. And, no, it isn’t to resign.
“The Brits would be happier outside. But we don’t want them to leave.”
If I am to vote to remain in the EU I need a lot more than a bit of tinkering around the edges by a Prime Minister who should be leading rather than following.