David Cameron must take up the Politics of Yes
The Prime Minister can best beat Miliband by proposing a positive vision of what Britain should be.
The Prime Minister can best beat Miliband by proposing a positive vision of what Britain should be.
This is a brilliant, dazzling work about how we treat our soldiers in a time of changing technology.
A UK Shale Gas fund, developed over time, could provide a sustainable financial legacy for future generations
Though it might not say so directly, ‘Crap Towns’ is, in fact, a plea for beauty – as something that should be present everywhere, not just in the enclaves of the rich.
We need energy that is both affordable and reliable. Labour offer one at the expense of the other – we must offer both.
There is a golden chance for Cameron after Miliband’s speech yesterday to show that lower taxes and less regulation are the route to better public services, lower energy bills and more homes
I am certainly not advocating the return of “light touch regulation”. But in its place has come a Government that guarantees against financial failure.
So far the leader of the Labour Party has been a chrysalis. Today he emerged, arguing the best way to solve problems is centralised control.
These questions and all our monthly ones in ConservativeHome’s special Party Conference survey. Please complete your form and have your say today.
Iran’s President simply speaks softly. But the words he whispers are those any goon’s sophisticated front-man: “You’d rather deal with me than with the menacing meathead behind me, wouldn’t you?”
Cameron could immediately make an offer to the Lib Dems to join him once again in what would “this time, be a liberal Conservative government, a One Nation Coalition”.
The changes needed to shore up the Euro will require some Treaty change. This certainly seems to be the expectation in the Netherlands.
What we need to hear in the days ahead are policies based on our principles that draw a clear distinction between us and the other parties.
“Achieving a Living Wage makes social sense, but it is important politically as well.”
So, if we are to ban the face veil worn by some Muslims, then why shouldn’t we ban all forms of attire that isolate their wearers from the mainstream?