Andrew Gimson’s PMQs sketch: May’s enraged backbenchers ask how she can cosy up to Corbyn
The Leader of the Opposition took the chance to do a bit of electioneering by praising Tony Blair’s achievements.
The Leader of the Opposition took the chance to do a bit of electioneering by praising Tony Blair’s achievements.
May has clearly given up on the party – not without reason – so will it now give up in her? What happens to what’s left of the confidence and supply deal?
The point is that we’re already signed up to a form of one under the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement. That’s what the backstop’s all about.
First, May denounces him as the devil. Next, she invites him to dine in Downing Street. The move cannot help Conservative local election candidates.
By saying for the first time that “the Government stands ready to abide by the decision of the House”, she risks splitting her own Party.
Not only are Leavers and Remainers drifting further apart, but the various Remain factions are now engaged in a furious blame game.
We refer, of course, to Letwin – the Prime Minister In All But Name. Not because he’s making a mess of things. But because, unlike others, he’s unaccountable.
The supporters of the softer Brexit and pro-Remain options have helped to do each other in. And Boles has walked out on the Conservative Party (it seems).
The protesters were at length evicted from the Public Gallery, but no one really seemed to be in charge.
The only options they have backed in this month’s survey are forms of No Deal – or to a lesser extent May’s Deal.
A party needs members. And if its leaders treat them as serfs rather than as owners, they will leave. We wish it luck in holding marginal seats without any.
Next time round, we will try run-offs between some of the main candidates, which are a bit ovedue.
Progressive commentators and saloon-bar orators are wrong to condemn MPs for finding the national issue hard to settle.
First time round, it lost by 230. Second time, by 149. The text of today’s motion was different, but will the political impact be the same?
Our take is that there is very little enthusiasm for the deal among Party members: merely a growing belief that it is the lesser of two evils.