Ten questions for Johnson about his lockdown plan
The proposals he will announce this evening can’t simply be taken on trust by voters.
The proposals he will announce this evening can’t simply be taken on trust by voters.
It is absurd and demeaning that we depend on Hancock, or on anyone in London, for the supply of hospital gowns.
The political logic of the Prime Minister’s choice is solid enough. But we’re past the stage where his Sunday statement can simply be taken on trust.
Both sides must recognise that the Corporation as a whole can be performing well whilst its political coverage alienates Conservatives.
Trying to decipher which Government has been “best” and “worst” at handling the crisis is a tricky endeavour.
Starmer obliged the Prime Minister to take him seriously: something Corbyn never achieved.
But overall the air goes out of the scores a little, with Hancock and Patel recording significant falls. Raab bucks the trend and regains the podium.
Technologically and culturally, the Asian country is a very different place – and it launched its programme before the virus could take root.
Four in five of our party member respondents say yes. Hunt is top choice to come in from outside – but there’s no strong support for any non-member.
Brady, Walker and Baker did their best to challenge the lockdown regulations, but Hancock preferred government by press conference.
There is a trend across the poll towards lockdown opposition – but it represents nothing like a majority of respondents.
The poll shows a Union Jack effect. Scratch the surface, and respondents back Johnson to the hilt. Probe deeper, and there are doubts.
The latter led the charge to build 300,000 homes a year – but the Health Secretary’s real achievement is to help create a new industry from scratch.
The Government is under pressure to tell the public to wear face masks. But if there’s not enough evidence, why?
The reluctance of the experts to predict Korean unification means the chances of this happening are almost certainly underestimated.