Dacre, Moore, Neil. Is triple change coming for the BBC?
Dacre has said that he “would die in a ditch defending it as a great civilising force”, and Moore grasps the Corporation’s original Reithian mission.
Dacre has said that he “would die in a ditch defending it as a great civilising force”, and Moore grasps the Corporation’s original Reithian mission.
He has a good eye for political openings, and Labour’s woes might have created a space for an avowedly left-wing, pro-UK figure.
So like his other big financial statements to date, his one yesterday had a strikingly provisional air.
From tech giants, to Conservatives’ own MPs, arguments over the Gender Recognition Act are far from over.
If we follow Spain and France, and test and trace doesn’t improve, the mood on the Tory backbenches is likely to shift towards a Sweden-style solution.
The Chancellor has refused to extend his furlough scheme. Could a German-style system be what comes next?
Starmer exposed factual contradictions in the PM’s statements: the PM preferred to defend Dido Harding, a damsel in distress.
More tests, quick tracing, quarantine and mini-shutdowns if necessary (not the closure of whole cities and metropolitan areas) are the best-in-class solution.
We are bringing our ever-popular series of interviews and debates to your screen – and they’ll be open to everyone, including non-Party members, for free.
Over a third of those who asked a question during a Hancock statement yesterday were to some degree resistant to such shutdowns.
During the last Parliament, the legislature tried to act as the executive. Now, there is a danger of the pendulum swinging too far the other way.
Despite the horrorshow commentary in the Tory press about the Government, the Conservatives cling to their poll lead – just.
It is easy to forget that until he left Downing Street he was the second most electorally successful post-war Tory leader.
Bars, restaurants and clubs are already affected by de facto curfews; the country has some of the earliest closing times in Europe.
The post-war system of international law is constantly evolving – it is inevitable, and justified, for government attitudes and approaches to evolve in turn.