“I’m very, very positive about China, but I’m very, very negative about the Chinese Communist Party.”
They make an odd couple, bound to infuriate each other, but already they have rescued PMQs from the torpor into which it had fallen.
American liberals have a fervent belief in equality, and will do everything they can for the American people short of spending any time with them.
Disraeli’s impudence and audacity, demonstrated in this collection of his sayings, cast light on the present Prime Minister’s conduct.
He would not conciliate the Liaison Committee by promising to meet it three times a year, let alone by holding an inquiry into Cummings.
“The new Sue Gray” – responsible for policing propriety and ethics – may yet be asked to rule whether Johnson’s adviser has behaved improperly.
The Prime Minister is being urged to employ more women, but here is one who already makes it difficult for him to get away with sloppy thinking.
The Leader of the Opposition was infuriated by these charges, but had forgotten the imperative need to be brief.
Rees-Mogg is right: we cannot tell children to go back to school if parliamentarians continue to play truant.
But David Enrich’s new book does include a lot about how Deutsche Bank lent the President the money needed to look successful.
The Leader of the Opposition showed, in the reasonable tone of a man on the Camden omnibus, that the official account is incoherent.
When Starmer tried to cross-examine him in order to produce clarity, Johnson simply refused to engage.
It is absurd and demeaning that we depend on Hancock, or on anyone in London, for the supply of hospital gowns.
Starmer obliged the Prime Minister to take him seriously: something Corbyn never achieved.
Brady, Walker and Baker did their best to challenge the lockdown regulations, but Hancock preferred government by press conference.