As time passes, a decreasing slice of the electorate has any experience at all of old-fashioned socialism. And the argument that it doesn’t work cuts little ice.
Today’s choice is between a woman who has grasped the scale and sweep of Brexit, and a man who has spent his entire career cuddling up to Britain’s enemies.
The Prime Minister’s manifesto will have its flaws, but she has grasped the implications of Brexit more surely than any other senior politician.
Is it truly necessary to keep reciting these arguments? Sadly, yes – in each generation some people are drawn to brutal ideologies.
We should not only meet our spending minimum, but exceed it in order to maximise our vital strategic and tactical needs.
Owen Jones is rewriting history.
Castro’s apologists find it too painful to admit they’ve raised a feeling of belonging above moral principle.
These futuristic gadgets can help fill a Queen’s Speech, but in real life, drivers will want to stay in control – at least for the time being.
Ranting and raving about his shortcomings is more likely to turn off the floating voters needed to win the referendum than otherwise.
It is not a “renegotiation” at all, since there is no treaty reform – a point President Hollande was quick to make yesterday.
Some who claim to believe in ‘liberté, égalité, fraternité’, have ended up making excuses for those who seek to destroy those very principles.
Stalin accused him of spying for Churchill and locked him up.
From the Falklands to the Middle East, he’s reliably on the wrong side.
The wholesale and widespread rejection of Marxism-Leninism is a testament to how thoroughly he and his comrades won the argument.
Tax credits, regulation, EU requirements – all help to explain why employment has risen but output has fallen outside the manufacturing sector, at least per person.