The basic principles of limited government, economic and civil liberties, freedom and equality under the law are almost entirely absent from her programme.
Regulation without representation would exacerbate the very lack of control that drove voters to choose Leave in the first place. It’s no solution at all.
In her belief in “the good that government can do”, she is quite unique in terms of UK political post-war history.
It is incumbent on all of us who have participated in the EU debate, on both sides, to confess to some sins and omissions.
The EU’s draft document suggests broad agreement on most of what we want. And the three bones of contention are surmountable.
New polling finds that they are proud of Britain’s action on climate change, and want the main EU environment regulations retained after Brexit.
His work provides a firm intellectual foundation for restoring the common law and passing power back to citizens and social institutions.
There is much more to politics than an affordable state and competitive taxes. But both will be indispensible for survival, let alone prosperity, after we leave the EU.
Some might like to table amendments to instantly delete bad EU regulations. But that would be a gift to those who seek to disrupt Brexit.
“It will help to ensure certainty and stability across the board.”
It was a British invention. But it makes no sense to subject ourselves to its rules once we have left the EU.
We have a head start but must keep updating the ways we defend creative products.
Agreeing zero tariffs is good, but non-tariff barriers matter just as much.
The Government’s foreign policy may deliver a good departure from the EU and stronger relations with the US, but we must have economic reform.
A major risk and a priority in the negotiations must be maintaining the EU’s system of financial passporting for British institutions.