Mohammed Abdel-Haq: Why preventing the Prevent strategy isn’t an option
A complacent tendency to assume ‘it couldn’t happen here’ is hindering necessary efforts to confront the challenge of domestic extremism.
A complacent tendency to assume ‘it couldn’t happen here’ is hindering necessary efforts to confront the challenge of domestic extremism.
Only ten years ago we’d have been mid-table, but since 2007 single-issue campaigners have struck a string of blows against lifestyle freedom.
There’s division, doubt and danger surrounding the prospect of Brexit. What would Unionism look like afterwards?
A key question is whether we want their entry into Europe to be controlled by governments or by gangs of people smugglers.
This policy refuses to recognise local choice, is supported by a poor evidence base, and proposes large-scale upheaval for uncertain gain.
Our report exposes the astonishing inadequacy of the procedures through which the ecclesiastical authorities reached their verdict.
After Paris and now Brussels, let’s avoid claims based on gut feelings, out-dated information or – dare I say it – wilful misunderstandings.
It will no longer be possible for schools to focus their energies and resources getting a narrow band of C/D grade students over the finishing line.
Why is the Government allowing itself to be bullied into accepting this baseless policy by civil servants?
Khan’s reckless and unfunded spending pledges threaten the future of the Tube, and our ability to solve the housing crisis by connecting with space for new homes.
The worst of the ideas associated with ‘multiculturalism’ have been pursued at a time when societal integration should have been the mantra.
It would be a tragedy if our reforming zeal and the important changes we are making became lost in a sea of negative internally-generated noise.
We should unify all schools under one simple legal status. Opponents of reform are full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
A recent UN report documented 119 incidents by the coalition forces, including attacks on weddings, mosques, ports and markets.
David Cameron’s successor will be pro-Leave – which will have profound implications for the future of the Party