Published:

By Peter Hoskin
Follow Peter on Twitter

Yes,
you did read that right. “Ed Miliband to explore historic break with trade
unions.” That’s really what the Guardian
headline
says.

But,
below that headline, the truth of the story is a little murkier. Apparently, “Miliband
has made no decisions on whether to break Labour’s links with the trade unions.”
And the idea that he should seems to have emerged from the shadows rather than
from the Labour leader’s office. One “former Cabinet minister” tells the paper
that “we need to have a commission that looks at the union link”.

And
it gets murkier still when you consider a tweet that LBC
Radio published earlier this morning. Turns out that, with the fires raging
around him, Miliband took time to call Ken Livingstone – yes, Ken Livingstone –
yesterday:

LBC

What
these competing stories suggest, to me at least, is that Miliband is going to hurry
to the half-way line and stay there. Enough separation from the unions that it
can be called “reform”; not so much that it angers the unions themselves, nor,
erm, Ken Livingtone. In a useful
post
over at LabourList, Mark Ferguson explains what these middle-ground
solutions might look like:

“…what the
mysterious ‘former cabinet minister’ suggests in the Guardian is that there
should be one category of union members. That could just as easily mean
bringing affiliated, levy paying trade unionists into the party as full members
– which although controversial and radical, would not constitute a break with
the unions, far from it. Another alternative would be to reintroduce the
affiliated membership status for affiliated trade unionists. That appears to be
a position that has support amongst the unions…”

Of
course, this raises the question of whether either side – the McCluskley-ites
or the break-the-link-ites – will be fully satisfied in the end. But there’s a
more important question than that: whether any of this will help overcome the current
impasse
over the funding of political parties. I won’t hold my breath for an
“opt-in,” rather than an “opt-out,” union levy, but now’s the time to talk
about that sort of thing.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.