Published:

Screen shot 2012-01-05 at 07.12.03

By Paul Goodman
Follow Paul on Twitter

Abbott tweeted the above late yesterday eveningGuido Fawkes argues that she thus deliberately provoked hatred of a racial group, and is therefore in breach of the 1986 Public Order Act.

I'm taken by the fact that Abbott is a member of Ed Miliband's front bench health team.  She was making Labour's case only yesterday over the breast implant row.

Aiden Burley was recently sacked as a PPS after reportedly hired a nazi costume for a stag party. David Cameron's decision to fire him was unavoidable.

This is worse: imagine how the Guardian or the BBC would react if a Conservative MP said that "black people love playing 'divide and rule' ".

They would be right to so so.  Such an MP would be maligning their fellow citizens on a racist basis.  This is exactly what Abbott has done.

Even the most clear-cut apology won't do.  Nadhim Zahawi MP believes that Abbott should quit and  Miliband should fire her if she doesn't.  This view is severe but correct.

And I hope that the BBC and the Guardian give Abbott the same coverage that they would devote to my imaginary Tory MP – noting as they do that she has form on this matter.

11.30am update: A statement from Labour has finally appeared.  It reads: "We disagree with Diane’s tweet. It is wrong to make sweeping generalisations about any race, creed, or culture."

So let's continue the imaginary exercise.  A Conservative front bencher tweets: "Black people love playing 'divide and rule' ".  He claims his remarks were taken out of context and CCHQ simply issues the statement above: no reprimand, no sacking.  What do you think would happen next?

12.15pm update: We now have from Abbott a classic non-apology apology. She said:  “I understand people have interpreted my comments as making generalisations about white people. I do not believe in doing that. I apologise for any offence caused.”

The problem wasn't that some people interpreted her tweet as making generalisations about white people.  It was that it did make generalisations about white people.

Comments are closed.